Make userbars clickable

So that when you click on them, it brings you to a page with all of the members within the group that userbar belongs to. Maybe make it work with only nonstandard userbars? I dunno, I just think it would be pretty cool. A good opportunity for some web animation too.

EDIT: We can make it expand to show all the other userbars a member owns, would that be better?

06-06-2016, 07:15 AM

fdigl Wrote: So that when you click on them, it brings you to a page with all of the members within the group that userbar belongs to. Maybe make it work with only nonstandard userbars? I dunno, I just think it would be pretty cool. A good opportunity for some web animation too.

That would be a nice feature, I also thought about even like a hover title when you put your mouse over the userbar has like a short description or something, that the group owner can set. Like when you mouse over Prime it says "Prime" but none of the custom / user owned groups have it. So I guess that wouldn't really be a new feature unless they can make it where the group owner's can set it to say what they want.

What do you mean nonstandard?
Honestly I wouldn't want people to be able to see everyone in my groups anyway..
I feel like it would lead to people pming or bothering my members for things that they shouldn't be bothered for.
Especially since you are able to recommend people into some of my groups.

I kinda downvote this.
(I lead all but one of the groups lol... so this has a pretty big impact on me)

06-06-2016, 07:20 AM

Asa Wrote: What do you mean nonstandard?
Honestly I wouldn't want people to be able to see everyone in my groups anyway..
I feel like it would lead to people pming or bothering my members for things that they shouldn't be bothered for.
Especially since you are able to recommend people into some of my groups.

I kinda downvote this.
(I lead all but one of the groups lol... so this has a pretty big impact on me)

I understand where your coming from, but couldn't you just see the members in those groups by their userbar anyways, like from when they post, etc. I mean yeah they probably can't find every single member that way but still be able to find quite a few that way anyways right?

06-06-2016, 07:20 AM

Asa Wrote: What do you mean nonstandard?
Honestly I wouldn't want people to be able to see everyone in my groups anyway..
I feel like it would lead to people pming or bothering my members for things that they shouldn't be bothered for.
Especially since you are able to recommend people into some of my groups.

I kinda downvote this.
(I lead all but one of the groups lol... so this has a pretty big impact on me)

Edited my suggestion, would the new suggestion be better?

06-06-2016, 07:23 AM

fdigl Wrote:

06-06-2016, 07:20 AM

Asa Wrote: What do you mean nonstandard?
Honestly I wouldn't want people to be able to see everyone in my groups anyway..
I feel like it would lead to people pming or bothering my members for things that they shouldn't be bothered for.
Especially since you are able to recommend people into some of my groups.

I kinda downvote this.
(I lead all but one of the groups lol... so this has a pretty big impact on me)

Edited my suggestion, would the new suggestion be better?

Owns? You mean like what the user is in. I feel like that would be a better idea then the first one. But make sure it's collapsible other wise I feel like it would make the postbit too large, specially for those in 3+ groups at the same time.

06-06-2016, 07:23 AM

fdigl Wrote:

06-06-2016, 07:20 AM

Asa Wrote: What do you mean nonstandard?
Honestly I wouldn't want people to be able to see everyone in my groups anyway..
I feel like it would lead to people pming or bothering my members for things that they shouldn't be bothered for.
Especially since you are able to recommend people into some of my groups.

I kinda downvote this.
(I lead all but one of the groups lol... so this has a pretty big impact on me)

Edited my suggestion, would the new suggestion be better?

Eh, but then it would just be like the profile list tbh..

As for your first suggestion, I think it would be kind of cool if the owners could set their groups to show or not show it.
What I mean by this is:

Writers: It would be nice to have as I could show who covers news sections.
Revelate: It would be nice to show who people can contact for help.

The rest of them would kind of be a burden to have.
So I'm not sure if it's even worth it in the end.

But it also kind of leads to another idea I had in the past if you would like it hear it.

06-06-2016, 07:27 AM

Asa Wrote:

06-06-2016, 07:23 AM

fdigl Wrote:

06-06-2016, 07:20 AM

Asa Wrote: What do you mean nonstandard?
Honestly I wouldn't want people to be able to see everyone in my groups anyway..
I feel like it would lead to people pming or bothering my members for things that they shouldn't be bothered for.
Especially since you are able to recommend people into some of my groups.

I kinda downvote this.
(I lead all but one of the groups lol... so this has a pretty big impact on me)

Edited my suggestion, would the new suggestion be better?

Eh, but then it would just be like the profile list tbh..

As for your first suggestion, I think it would be kind of cool if the owners could set their groups to show or not show it.
What I mean by this is:

Writers: It would be nice to have as I could show who covers news sections.
Revelate: It would be nice to show who people can contact for help.

The rest of them would kind of be a burden to have.
So I'm not sure if it's even worth it in the end.

But it also kind of leads to another idea I had in the past if you would like it hear it.

When you put it like that, I feel like that would be too much of a hassle to even code for it to be worth it.

But I'm done to hear your other idea.

06-06-2016, 07:29 AM

LeadEnthusiast Wrote:

06-06-2016, 07:27 AM

Asa Wrote:

06-06-2016, 07:23 AM

fdigl Wrote:

06-06-2016, 07:20 AM

Asa Wrote: What do you mean nonstandard?
Honestly I wouldn't want people to be able to see everyone in my groups anyway..
I feel like it would lead to people pming or bothering my members for things that they shouldn't be bothered for.
Especially since you are able to recommend people into some of my groups.

I kinda downvote this.
(I lead all but one of the groups lol... so this has a pretty big impact on me)

Edited my suggestion, would the new suggestion be better?

Eh, but then it would just be like the profile list tbh..

As for your first suggestion, I think it would be kind of cool if the owners could set their groups to show or not show it.
What I mean by this is:

Writers: It would be nice to have as I could show who covers news sections.
Revelate: It would be nice to show who people can contact for help.

The rest of them would kind of be a burden to have.
So I'm not sure if it's even worth it in the end.

But it also kind of leads to another idea I had in the past if you would like it hear it.

When you put it like that, I feel like that would be too much of a hassle to even code for it to be worth it.

But I'm done to hear your other idea.

It's more of something Aoki would have to be willing to do as it's kind of not huge, nor is it really 100% needed, but if for groups like writers and revelate we could have a public memberlist that allowed us to set a custom text/role to each of the members on the list, that would be amazing.

For example, I could use the list and add the section the member covers under their name on the list so that people can know who covers what section of the news.
Or for revelate I could put the subject the member focuses on so that people know who to contact for what in the group.

But honestly I don't believe this would be worth the effort Aoki would have to put into it. And I know he already has enough to work on for v3.

It was just something that slipped through my head.

06-06-2016, 07:34 AM

Asa Wrote:

06-06-2016, 07:29 AM

LeadEnthusiast Wrote:

06-06-2016, 07:27 AM

Asa Wrote:

06-06-2016, 07:23 AM

fdigl Wrote:

06-06-2016, 07:20 AM

Asa Wrote: What do you mean nonstandard?
Honestly I wouldn't want people to be able to see everyone in my groups anyway..
I feel like it would lead to people pming or bothering my members for things that they shouldn't be bothered for.
Especially since you are able to recommend people into some of my groups.

I kinda downvote this.
(I lead all but one of the groups lol... so this has a pretty big impact on me)

Edited my suggestion, would the new suggestion be better?

Eh, but then it would just be like the profile list tbh..

As for your first suggestion, I think it would be kind of cool if the owners could set their groups to show or not show it.
What I mean by this is:

Writers: It would be nice to have as I could show who covers news sections.
Revelate: It would be nice to show who people can contact for help.

The rest of them would kind of be a burden to have.
So I'm not sure if it's even worth it in the end.

But it also kind of leads to another idea I had in the past if you would like it hear it.

When you put it like that, I feel like that would be too much of a hassle to even code for it to be worth it.

But I'm done to hear your other idea.

It's more of something Aoki would have to be willing to do as it's kind of not huge, nor is it really 100% needed, but if for groups like writers and revelate we could have a public memberlist that allowed us to set a custom text/role to each of the members on the list, that would be amazing.

For example, I could use the list and add the section the member covers under their name on the list so that people can know who covers what section of the news.
Or for revelate I could put the subject the member focuses on so that people know who to contact for what in the group.

But honestly I don't believe this would be worth the effort Aoki would have to put into it. And I know he already has enough to work on for v3.

It was just something that slipped through my head.

I get that, couldn't these members simply just put something in their "Title" for that as well though?