Apple Vision Pro vs Meta Quest

So who do you think has the right vision for the future?

Apple's high end flat app focused headset OR Meta's affordable, immersive experience headset?

I think for work and daily use the VisionPro could be good.. but to expensive

These are apple and orange comparisons imo. Both target two very different market segments and consumers. Apple being a more AR focus for people who have cash to burn. Meta is focusing more on VR and the general consumer given the much lower price point.

I like vision pro when it initially came out.

Apple's high-end flat app focused headset:

Apple has a history of focusing on premium, high-end products that prioritize design, user experience, and ecosystem integration. If they are developing a high-end flat app-focused headset, it could potentially mean that they aim to create a premium device with a sleek design and a focus on seamless integration with their existing app ecosystem. This might appeal to consumers who are already deeply invested in the Apple ecosystem and are willing to pay a premium for a polished and user-friendly experience.

Meta's affordable, immersive experience headset:

Meta, on the other hand, has been investing heavily in virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies with the goal of creating immersive experiences for a broad audience. If they are working on an affordable, immersive experience headset, their vision might be to make VR more accessible to a wider range of people. By offering a more budget-friendly device, they could potentially attract a larger customer base and increase the adoption of VR technology.

Ultimately, the "right" vision for the future depends on various factors, including market demand, technological advancements, and consumer preferences. Both approaches have their merits and target different segments of the market. Apple's focus on a high-end, app-focused device might appeal to its existing user base and those who prioritize a premium experience. On the other hand, Meta's emphasis on affordability and immersive experiences aims to broaden the appeal of VR to a larger audience.

In the end, it's up to consumers to decide which vision aligns better with their preferences and needs. As both companies continue to innovate and improve their products, the landscape of VR and AR headsets is likely to evolve, offering consumers more options and possibilities for the future.

both seem to be amazing but the meta quest seems to be the most innovative

The metal headset is cheaper and still does it job while 4h3 A Pair a bit more better but far more expensive than the meta head set.

Meta is focusing more on VR and the general consumer given the much lower price point.

VR and the general consumer given the much lower price point. i dont speak more

I think for work and daily use the VisionPro could be good.. but to expensive

---

VR and the general consumer given the much lower price point. i dont speak more