Denied vote to unban

I mean if it had had restrictions like not scammer or carders.

But then again what's the point in appeals if they can just get a bunch of people to click a button.

I mean if it had had restrictions like not scammer or carders.

But then again what's the point in appeals if they can just get a bunch of people to click a button.

I mean if it had had restrictions like not scammer or carders.

But then again what's the point in appeals if they can just get a bunch of people to click a button.

20-02-2018, 02:18 AM

mohachet Wrote: (not sure if i used the right term)
basically , add a "unban" button in the profile of the banned person
so when a certain amount of members (50 for example) click it
that person will be automatically unbanned .

Omg no please not thus thats just stupid :lol:
Theirs rule and you need to understand them

20-02-2018, 03:55 AM

MarcFryd Wrote: Omg no please not thus thats just stupid :lol:
Theirs rule and you need to understand them

We don't need rules when we have an unban rule.

20-02-2018, 03:55 AM

MarcFryd Wrote: Omg no please not thus thats just stupid :lol:
Theirs rule and you need to understand them

We don't need rules when we have an unban rule.

20-02-2018, 03:55 AM

MarcFryd Wrote: Omg no please not thus thats just stupid :lol:
Theirs rule and you need to understand them

We don't need rules when we have an unban rule.

This is a stupid suggestion, sorry. Let me explain why and how this is not going to work out, ever.


- When people are banned, they are for a reason. Whether it is scamming, leeching or flaming it's not a nonsense ban. The given ban basically cleans the forums from another offender. This minimizes the chance to have the forum damaged in any specific way. What do you think when there's a ban button for someone that scammed? The user will probably spam everyone on Discord or on a multi-account to ask if they can click that button. You're just going to inflate the bubble, even more, we don't want that.

- Society is not going to release you from jail if you committed a murder, but it reached the news on five different channels or 50 protestors. The only way someone would be released is if they're proven innocent, or they've shown their dedication and change of habitat in their sentence. Same applies here; you're going to be unbanned if you're innocent, not if you're famous

- I see no effect here as leechers will just make another account and users like A won't be unbanned anyway.

This wouldn't ever happen as it would get abused. Staff should only be involved in the unbanning of users.

Don't post something like this in this section again.