Lolis?

15-12-2016, 07:20 PM

Faded Wrote: Too lazy to read the rest, but I saw you complaining about the source part, where I actually mentioned the part even if the screenshot was cut out, take a second look.

In a debate, it is common logic to provide a ling to all sources used. This is to fail-proof it in the incident that someone might have cut away parts of it before using it. (Like you did.) By not doing this, the source is not counted as "valid" as far as a debate it considered. Even worse is the fact that you did cut away the part that you didn't like about it, to further your point and by not linking back to it, you come off as if you tried to hide that fact.

---

15-12-2016, 07:21 PM

Silence Wrote: No, you do not. That is completely false lmao. You can simply be stating they are cute based on their appearance, I can say that someone's dress is cute so does that make me attracted to that dress? No.

Actually, it does. It at least means that you find the dress attractive in a endearing way. That is why it is more common to say that you find a dress "cute on you" than the dress itself.