Serious Change My Mind Number 1

25-03-2018, 11:45 AM

Aeux Wrote: Okay so this is different comparing the countries in .. America and Finland .

When you commit a crime, even the smallest one you're asked to show off your pockets and everything, the police officer will take it all and by the laws w/E you may get back you will but not the illegal items. and you're held in a small space for x amount of days until you commit the crime or they ask you to commit things that may never even been happened which is sick to the human nature.

In Finland the GOV can take your gun just by a snap o' fingers no matter if it's legal or illegal all they have to do is to check if you're a risk to the community - Being on drugs or alcohol is just enough. which could be pretty much the same as creating the cause to do things to control you without your own permission which feels damn bad.

The Police can't come to my house either without a search warrant to inspect what I might have in my apartment but if I look like a risk it doesn't take long for them to do so or maybe they even do it hidden from us so they just trace what's going on for real in the worlds. which doesn't sound honest at all that they can just create a problem which doesn't even exist.


The stuff I might write is quickly created from my mind and I write another language that I'm familiar with so I hope you understand my beliefs and what I'm trying to say.
I don't really do facts to - Please try to keep these texts as valid or invalid opinions by Aeux. Google is the tool that helps you to check if you like to play with Facts.


I've been skipping much of what you wrote I'll definitely check back on later with time.

Great thread, OP.

25-03-2018, 11:49 AM

Teratronic Wrote: The Bill of Rights exists so that each citizen has their rights protected. Unfortunately not every country, such as Finland as it sounds, has a document similar to America's. Like I said before, a cop can't search someone without probable cause. I would also like to say that you should not shoot a cop for trying to take your gun, depending on the circumstance. For example lets say this cop was ordered to take my gun by a State or Federal government in order to make sure I have no way to fight back against them. The only way I would shoot the cop is if he/she pulls out their weapon and tries to harm me or my family. This would only work if the intent of the cop was evil.

I'll read your posts soon please check this post #44 I edited just a few seconds ago.
https://nulledbb.com/thread-Serious-Chan...#pid637723

25-03-2018, 11:51 AM

Teratronic Wrote: But if there were no guns, anybody could break into a house knowing full well that they could harm that person. Not knowing if that person in the house has a gun or not stops a lot of criminals from breaking in. You can't deny someone the right to protect themself or their family from someone who intends to harm them.

Perfect <3 but this creates the problem that there is a fear which is real as this kind of things do happen but the mass-shootings made by a singular person creates the real problem with the guns as this kind of things should never happen.. Civils should not get Harmed.

and this is the thing you may not be quick enough to protect from with the gun you own as it's not because of the gun it's because of the person who owns the gun.

No thing can protect one from owning a gun because there isn't resources to surveillance every people on earth daily from minute to minute because not every gun got (if any) has a GPS chip which tells (who, the government? the gun owner?) where the gun is moving at this moment or where it is the next minute.

Protect your family and do not let them restrain.