[spoiler='Design Feedback']There's one issue that plagues the entire design as whole, that is the gradient used or rather the format it is used within. There seems to either be a complete lack of or a bad use of Dither making the gradient look blocky rather than smooth in it's transition. It's true that this depend on the monitor used, though a good designer knows how to make something near universal. Another thing that is oddly alike the previous issue I noted is the text.
The format it is placed in (Sharp) looks nice if the elements are large and visible, though they turn awful the moment they are resized after the file has been made. The result is text that is blurry and "smudged" so to speak. This issue occurs whenever the image is resized and considering it's size in width (1080) then it will be resized on almost every single forum you can come across. Meaning it is almost universally bad to use on a forum, which works against it's main purpose.
What I have no quarrel in the use of is the icons selected, they are fine and have no obvious problems with them. One issue with the overall use of them though and not their individual use is what they are. The logo is a non-organic design where as the majority of other icons are organic and there are elements of both organic and non-organic design in the entire thread design. There isn't much of an issue if you use those two together, you just have to keep them somewhat separate.
That means the elements themselves can be say organic and the icons be non-organic, however (except in very rare cases) the elements shouldn't be both organic and non-organic at the same time unless it can be rationally explained away by logic. (Material design does this by mixing the two slightly with their standard navi bar.)
Though the biggest issue by far is the entire pricing area of the design. Let's talk boxes first. Why are they sharp? The there are no icons, no fonts and no image (other than the one logo) that implies that the boxes should be sharp. The background boxes aren't curved because they stretch across the entire design (which is what I said about explaining it away with logic) so there is no reason why the boxes in the pricing area should be sharp. They'd look far better with a bit of smoothing to them. I'd make an example but it would be annoying to do because of how you made the PSD, more on that later.
Now let us talk headers. Here is an odd thing, "Bronze" and "Sliver" pack headers aren't centered properly, neither in height nor width. However the "Gold" is centered properly. This makes me assume that you did the "Gold" first and checked it, then just assumed the rest would be centered just as fine, while in reality they aren't. (It is visible, and I could give you an exact pixel count if you want.) This is also the case of the actual price tags as well, which is even more bothersome because it affects all three of them, not just one or two.
Right under that is another issue, the color of the approved payment methods and their icons. It blends far too well with the background, making it more of an annoyance to read than anything. So that were my two penny's worth of design opinion, now let me share an opinion that is specifically more relevant to this kind of thread. We are gonna talk about the PSD.[/spoiler]
[spoiler='PSD Feedback']I found several problems with this share right off the bat. The first and most obvious one is that you didn't use standard fonts while completely neglecting to comment on that or share the font files. Now that isn't user-friendly. (It is extremely annoying for people looking to use this kind of thing, as they are probably not so well versed in design.) Another thing that isn't user-friendly is the organization of the PSD itself, by that I means the layers within it. Let us list the elements as they appear in the design:
- Header
- About
- Features
- Pricing
- Contact
- Footer
Now let us list them as they appear in the PSD:
- Footer
- Contact
- Pricing
- Features
- About
- Header
That is non-logical and annoying for people. What this does is forcing people to work with your flow, instead of their own. Making it more annoying than enjoyable to learn anything from this PSD. One last note before we dwell into the folders themselves. Why are (example) "Home" and "Features" both the same color? What do they have in common? Oh right, they don't have anything in common and they are likely the same color for the sake of laziness or "I wanted to make it look artistic".
Now let us talk about "left overs". By that I mean layers you intended to use at one point, but decided not to use anyways. Like the "Taskbar" for the header. It serves no purpose and it looks awful on the design which is likely why you decided to not include it in the finished product, then why is it in the finished PSD? The entire "Home" folder has the same organization problem as the folders themselves, they come in an very illogical pattern. The elements appear as;
- Taskbar
- Logo
- Undertitle
- Description
- Arrow
But the layers appear;
- Taskbar
- Arrow
- Logo
- Description
- Undertitle
- Title
This is a problem throughout the entire PSD. The final thing I'd like to note is about the Rulers and the positioning of elements. Most of (if not all of) the elements are off-center despite the fact that the Rulers are placed to show the center. So why make them if you aren't going to use them? If you used them during the creation but they are no longer accurate, remove them before sharing the PSD. People use these kind of things to learn, not to get dizzy and die of it. This goes back to what I meant when I said that this PSD is everything but user-friendly.[/spoiler]
The format it is placed in (Sharp) looks nice if the elements are large and visible, though they turn awful the moment they are resized after the file has been made. The result is text that is blurry and "smudged" so to speak. This issue occurs whenever the image is resized and considering it's size in width (1080) then it will be resized on almost every single forum you can come across. Meaning it is almost universally bad to use on a forum, which works against it's main purpose.
What I have no quarrel in the use of is the icons selected, they are fine and have no obvious problems with them. One issue with the overall use of them though and not their individual use is what they are. The logo is a non-organic design where as the majority of other icons are organic and there are elements of both organic and non-organic design in the entire thread design. There isn't much of an issue if you use those two together, you just have to keep them somewhat separate.
That means the elements themselves can be say organic and the icons be non-organic, however (except in very rare cases) the elements shouldn't be both organic and non-organic at the same time unless it can be rationally explained away by logic. (Material design does this by mixing the two slightly with their standard navi bar.)
Though the biggest issue by far is the entire pricing area of the design. Let's talk boxes first. Why are they sharp? The there are no icons, no fonts and no image (other than the one logo) that implies that the boxes should be sharp. The background boxes aren't curved because they stretch across the entire design (which is what I said about explaining it away with logic) so there is no reason why the boxes in the pricing area should be sharp. They'd look far better with a bit of smoothing to them. I'd make an example but it would be annoying to do because of how you made the PSD, more on that later.
Now let us talk headers. Here is an odd thing, "Bronze" and "Sliver" pack headers aren't centered properly, neither in height nor width. However the "Gold" is centered properly. This makes me assume that you did the "Gold" first and checked it, then just assumed the rest would be centered just as fine, while in reality they aren't. (It is visible, and I could give you an exact pixel count if you want.) This is also the case of the actual price tags as well, which is even more bothersome because it affects all three of them, not just one or two.
Right under that is another issue, the color of the approved payment methods and their icons. It blends far too well with the background, making it more of an annoyance to read than anything. So that were my two penny's worth of design opinion, now let me share an opinion that is specifically more relevant to this kind of thread. We are gonna talk about the PSD.[/spoiler]
[spoiler='PSD Feedback']I found several problems with this share right off the bat. The first and most obvious one is that you didn't use standard fonts while completely neglecting to comment on that or share the font files. Now that isn't user-friendly. (It is extremely annoying for people looking to use this kind of thing, as they are probably not so well versed in design.) Another thing that isn't user-friendly is the organization of the PSD itself, by that I means the layers within it. Let us list the elements as they appear in the design:
- Header
- About
- Features
- Pricing
- Contact
- Footer
Now let us list them as they appear in the PSD:
- Footer
- Contact
- Pricing
- Features
- About
- Header
That is non-logical and annoying for people. What this does is forcing people to work with your flow, instead of their own. Making it more annoying than enjoyable to learn anything from this PSD. One last note before we dwell into the folders themselves. Why are (example) "Home" and "Features" both the same color? What do they have in common? Oh right, they don't have anything in common and they are likely the same color for the sake of laziness or "I wanted to make it look artistic".
Now let us talk about "left overs". By that I mean layers you intended to use at one point, but decided not to use anyways. Like the "Taskbar" for the header. It serves no purpose and it looks awful on the design which is likely why you decided to not include it in the finished product, then why is it in the finished PSD? The entire "Home" folder has the same organization problem as the folders themselves, they come in an very illogical pattern. The elements appear as;
- Taskbar
- Logo
- Undertitle
- Description
- Arrow
But the layers appear;
- Taskbar
- Arrow
- Logo
- Description
- Undertitle
- Title
This is a problem throughout the entire PSD. The final thing I'd like to note is about the Rulers and the positioning of elements. Most of (if not all of) the elements are off-center despite the fact that the Rulers are placed to show the center. So why make them if you aren't going to use them? If you used them during the creation but they are no longer accurate, remove them before sharing the PSD. People use these kind of things to learn, not to get dizzy and die of it. This goes back to what I meant when I said that this PSD is everything but user-friendly.[/spoiler]