Fallout, the debate.

Now, I have heard it all the time. "Oh, Fallout 1 and 2 are FAR superior to 3", or "Oh, Fallout New Vegas is better than anything". Both sides seem to agree that Fallout 4 is horrid, and I want to know WHY?

Fallout 4 is very fun, I enjoy it more than New Vegas. I know I'm going to get a lot of hate for that, and I understand the appeal of NV. NV is a great game don't get me wrong, I just prefer Fallout 4. The thing I can't understand tho, is the argument that the classics are better than anything. The classics are slow and boring, what is so appealing? The story? The RPG elements? None of those could keep me interested for more than 5 minutes. I'm sorry lmao.