Futuristic Warfare or Boots on the Ground?

No idea, dont play, personally, not that big of a fan

Boots on the Ground, definitely, future is every second game, we need something particular, normal, so WW2 is great

Boots on the ground, although i'm not a big fan of WWII.

I think every game from now on should be boots on the ground. Titanfall has way better mechanics for the future stuff and is way better than BO3, AW, IW.

Honestly, I dont really understand why. It just is there to be there. No questions

I love games that are Boots on The Ground, because they're more realistic, and something that people can better relate to.
When games start going far off into the future, they start to lose the connection that can really make us thing as if we were them, and because of that we start losing the immersion, or at least that's how I see it.
I like games that are either based on the past, or what could have happened.
Although, there's not a lot of games that are based off what could have happened (The only one I can think of is Wolfenstein, where the Nazi's won)... Probably for some good reason but IMO there should be more of those kinds of games. (not saying it as I WANT MORE GAMES WHERE I CAN SHOOT NAZIS, I'm just saying it'd be cool if there were alternate history games based off similar things).

Boots on the ground, but I will admit that AW was the most innovative CoD in 10 years.

Boots on the ground, it'll just get too convoluted in my opinion.

I think boots on the ground is more appropriate for the entire franchise, since it is what it was founded off of.

Would like to see a game with both, like "game modes" in a way.