Garry's Mod

What's better? (FA:S, TFA, CW 2.0 or M9K?)

Submitted by OK Boomer, , Thread ID: 177600

Thread Closed

RE: What's better? (FA:S, TFA, CW 2.0 or M9K?)

#21
I personally think tfa is best if not tell me why i would like to know

RE: What's better? (FA:S, TFA, CW 2.0 or M9K?)

#22
Use TFA or M9K. The most optimized and practicable weapons pack

RE: What's better? (FA:S, TFA, CW 2.0 or M9K?)

#23
Personally I love the flexibility of CW 2.0, it reminds me a lot of how weapons in ArmA work.
M9k is the best, on my opinion, i like dis weapon addon

RE: What's better? (FA:S, TFA, CW 2.0 or M9K?)

#24
Texture qualities suck in m9k and there is not a single customization for it. And it is ridicilously unbalanced. (Some weps are good some weps are trash etc etc.) CW 2.0 is way better.

RE: What's better? (FA:S, TFA, CW 2.0 or M9K?)

#25
Personally i would choose CW 2.0, mainly because of the attachment features..

RE: What's better? (FA:S, TFA, CW 2.0 or M9K?)

#26
M9K for my server. M9k is quite old but still acceptable. it is also user friendly as the weapons are easy to use. Very cool.

RE: What's better? (FA:S, TFA, CW 2.0 or M9K?)

#27
55555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555

RE: What's better? (FA:S, TFA, CW 2.0 or M9K?)

#28
Honestly its just opinion. M9k is old besides from the extra weaponry (like nades or the nuke) but TFA and ArcCW are pretty strong choices
I like leaks. Fuck leeching.

RE: What's better? (FA:S, TFA, CW 2.0 or M9K?)

#29
CW is pretty good, ARCCW is new but is the same size as cw, m9k is garbage, and FA:S is meh

RE: What's better? (FA:S, TFA, CW 2.0 or M9K?)

#30
I use M9K for my server. M9k is quite old but still acceptable. it is also user friendly as the weapons are easy to use

Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)