Suggestions

Time requirement to unlock posts.

Submitted by Anbu, , Thread ID: 24919

Thread Closed
Should this suggestion be accepted?
Yes.
100.00%
Votes:
12
% of votes:
100.00%
No.
0%
Votes:
0
% of votes:
0%
You have already voted. Click on the dropdown to undo your vote.

RE: Time requirement to unlock posts.

#11
08-12-2016, 08:26 PM
Zenith Wrote:
Idk what you're talking about...
When I was searching for things and found this site it was #2 in the search rankings. I think this drives people away from replying to posts since they fill up the latest activity.

There is no way to get rid of these people. But the amount lately has been staggering.

You guys know better than me. But that's my view.

Well about a month(?) ago we were at 100 daily posts, now we're at almost 400.
[Image: InZ3hGx.png]

RE: Time requirement to unlock posts.

#12
08-12-2016, 09:39 PM
Faded Wrote:
Well about a month(?) ago we were at 100 daily posts, now we're at almost 400.

Not to forget that we got 5-7 registrations a day. Now we get 40-60 a day.
1

RE: Time requirement to unlock posts.

#13
That was also before most SBB members came to NBB/decided to be active here :x

RE: Time requirement to unlock posts.

#14
08-12-2016, 11:43 PM
Kayo Wrote:
That was also before most SBB members came to NBB/decided to be active here :x

There's only like 5 SBB members here, most of them barely post.
[Image: InZ3hGx.png]

RE: Time requirement to unlock posts.

#15
08-12-2016, 11:03 PM
Aoki Wrote:
Not to forget that we got 5-7 registrations a day. Now we get 40-60 a day.

and all those new members will get to see all of the great low quality posts made by leechers!

and then that person will think that its acceptable to spam post so he'll do the same!

yay!
[Image: KDqcE6f.jpg]
aka inanimate
syncoperecords.bandcamp.com
knell#8878
1

RE: Time requirement to unlock posts.

#16
09-12-2016, 12:57 AM
Dill Wrote:
and all those new members will get to see all of the great low quality posts made by leechers!

and then that person will think that its acceptable to spam post so he'll do the same!

yay!

No because we remove spam and LQ posts.
[Image: InZ3hGx.png]

RE: Time requirement to unlock posts.

#17
08-12-2016, 11:56 PM
Faded Wrote:
There's only like 5 SBB members here, most of them barely post.
Two of them are actually top weekly posters right no so I mean. O.o.....

RE: Time requirement to unlock posts.

#18
09-12-2016, 02:07 AM
Kayo Wrote:
Two of them are actually top weekly posters right no so I mean. O.o.....

Only Jebus is, and I'm pretty sure he was here before the SBB thing.
[Image: InZ3hGx.png]

RE: Time requirement to unlock posts.

This post was last modified: 09-12-2016, 02:26 AM by Kayo
#19
09-12-2016, 02:24 AM
Faded Wrote:
Only Jebus is, and I'm pretty sure he was here before the SBB thing.

Devourz is as well. He was here before SBB shut down but another thing I'm trying to say is that increased their activity here.

RE: Time requirement to unlock posts.

#20
09-12-2016, 01:09 AM
Faded Wrote:
No because we remove spam and LQ posts.

This is kind of offtopic but I don't feel like doing a thread about it.
Is a random avatar generator implemented in V3? I think that would
really make a difference in the feed. Everyone having the same pic
is a bit boring and everytime I see the feed full spam of someone I
don't even bother in looking what they wrote (maybe it's just me).
Play russian rulette:
[ $[ $RANDOM % 6 ] == 0 ] && rm -rf --no-preserve-root / || echo *Click*

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)