Minecraft

1.8 vs 1.16 Combat

Submitted by LaxStream, , Thread ID: 192717

Thread Closed

RE: 1.8 vs 1.16 Combat

#101
I prefer 1.8.9, simply because a stone axe shouldn't do as much damage as a diamond sword imo. And the delay is quite annoying.

RE: 1.8 vs 1.16 Combat

#102
1.16 is better than 1.8 because you can do a lot more

RE: 1.8 vs 1.16 Combat

#103
1.16 ,

RE: 1.8 vs 1.16 Combat

#104
1.8 for PvP, 1.16 for PvE. I think having an option, like a toggle for servers would be useful.

RE: 1.8 vs 1.16 Combat

#105
If in 1.16.2 add pvp how in 1.8
My choose 1.16.2
I like pvp without delay, but 1.16.2 more blocks and other
I don't know

RE: 1.8 vs 1.16 Combat

#106
1.8 is more for pvp and combat and 1.16 is for pve

RE: 1.8 vs 1.16 Combat

#107
I pefer the old compact , because it doesnt have sword cooldown

RE: 1.8 vs 1.16 Combat

#108
In my opinion, the new pvp is fun for survival and so on, but the old one is for people who like to fight, such as pvp arenas

RE: 1.8 vs 1.16 Combat

#109
The older combat took more skill in my opinion, it was all about practicing CPS. I remember waking up at 5 am practicing my CPS before school just so when I get home I can wreck other people. I enjoy the feeling of them calling hacks on me.

RE: 1.8 vs 1.16 Combat

#110
I play 1.8 when I want to pvp and I use 1.16+ for survival because its more fun

Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)