PC Am I the only one who thinks games used to be bettter before 2011?

games are way too pay to have fun now it should never have ended up like this

I feel like this is kind of true due to now there is so much money in games where in the past it was more passion over money.

mmmmm i think so ur right?! i mean nowdays they make games to gain more money and pust donate in singlegame projects.

Games used to be more complete back then and had alot more content now they just bang out games quick n cheaply with many bugs

The last really enjoyable FPS I played was in 2013 Battlefield 3.
no hackers, no cheaters at that time

whats wrong with among us among us among us among us

i think dlc made games better and worse..i enjoy that games can be updated now but also now they are selling unfinished games at full price and sometimes with bugs that make the game unplayable...i guess its a blessing and a curse with the advancement of things..

I am gonna get a lot of hate on it. But the truth is majority of forum peeps are talking out of their nostalgia.
As a kid who grew up with both the old and new games, I can defend the new games because they are polished and because tech advancements they are more playable. No wonder companies are making remakes.

But I will side with some who say that was passion and idea were more raw during those days. Now multiplayer games are the money makers and really good story games like BioShock unfortunately get cracked.

maybe because before, it is simple and easy to play.