Rocket Network Logo

Well the tree cant be seen, just can see the rocket and some sort of planet with spirals around, i would try to resimplify a bit more

22-10-2017, 09:50 PM

nayvia Wrote: Well the tree cant be seen, just can see the rocket and some sort of planet with spirals around, i would try to resimplify a bit more

How simple can it get? Rocket, Planet, Network. How do I keep all and simplify?

22-10-2017, 09:50 PM

nayvia Wrote: Well the tree cant be seen, just can see the rocket and some sort of planet with spirals around, i would try to resimplify a bit more

How simple can it get? Rocket, Planet, Network. How do I keep all and simplify?

23-10-2017, 07:03 PM

Bubble Wrote: How simple can it get? Rocket, Planet, Network. How do I keep all and simplify?

Well. Right now it seems more like; rocket, atom rather than rocket, planet, network. A planet is usually not a good way to demonstrate "network" and even if it is, then using lines that makes it look like an atom really isn't a good idea either. The issue isn't that it isn't simple enough, the issue is that it is simple, which makes it hard to express properly. (In this case I'd say you failed on the expression part, not the simplifying part.)

23-10-2017, 07:03 PM

Bubble Wrote: How simple can it get? Rocket, Planet, Network. How do I keep all and simplify?

let me show you some examples og what i mean:
https://cdn.dribbble.com/users/49803/scr...net_1x.jpg

https://st2.depositphotos.com/3382541/11...design.jpg

https://hative.com/wp-content/uploads/20...ogo-15.png


I mean you can simply it much more, and make it easier for the eye

23-10-2017, 11:34 PM

Lukecetion Wrote: Well. Right now it seems more like; rocket, atom rather than rocket, planet, network. A planet is usually not a good way to demonstrate "network" and even if it is, then using lines that makes it look like an atom really isn't a good idea either. The issue isn't that it isn't simple enough, the issue is that it is simple, which makes it hard to express properly. (In this case I'd say you failed on the expression part, not the simplifying part.)

Jesus I thought you were dead. I didn't know what I was doing for the logo. Client wanted space, I thought of a rocket, planet and atom looking things. Slapped them all together and boom. Looked like a tree to me lol So I went with it.

---

24-10-2017, 12:16 AM

nayvia Wrote: let me show you some examples og what i mean:
https://cdn.dribbble.com/users/49803/scr...net_1x.jpg

https://st2.depositphotos.com/3382541/11...design.jpg

https://hative.com/wp-content/uploads/20...ogo-15.png


I mean you can simply it much more, and make it easier for the eye

I get what you mean now. I like my design's simplicity/complexity how it is though.

23-10-2017, 11:34 PM

Lukecetion Wrote: Well. Right now it seems more like; rocket, atom rather than rocket, planet, network. A planet is usually not a good way to demonstrate "network" and even if it is, then using lines that makes it look like an atom really isn't a good idea either. The issue isn't that it isn't simple enough, the issue is that it is simple, which makes it hard to express properly. (In this case I'd say you failed on the expression part, not the simplifying part.)

Jesus I thought you were dead. I didn't know what I was doing for the logo. Client wanted space, I thought of a rocket, planet and atom looking things. Slapped them all together and boom. Looked like a tree to me lol So I went with it.

---

24-10-2017, 12:16 AM

nayvia Wrote: let me show you some examples og what i mean:
https://cdn.dribbble.com/users/49803/scr...net_1x.jpg

https://st2.depositphotos.com/3382541/11...design.jpg

https://hative.com/wp-content/uploads/20...ogo-15.png


I mean you can simply it much more, and make it easier for the eye

I get what you mean now. I like my design's simplicity/complexity how it is though.

24-10-2017, 12:16 AM

nayvia Wrote: I mean you can simply it much more, and make it easier for the eye

Well. The first one is just badly and crudely designed. That and it isn't an example of a "more simple" design. It has less lines, sure. That being said, it over-complicates itself by using width contrasts and weight contrasts all over the place. The second one is the only really "good" example, as it doesn't overcomplicate itself in any meaningful way. Well aside from the random "moon" at the top, which is unneeded. Giving it the same problem you insist that Bubble's work has. The third is at least made competently though it is so much alike Bubble's that it is hard to claim that it is much "simpler" in it's design, which it really isn't. It have up some weight in order to give into complexity in it's view. Which isn't a sign of "simplicity" either.

24-10-2017, 02:06 AM

Bubble Wrote: Jesus I thought you were dead. I didn't know what I was doing for the logo. Client wanted space, I thought of a rocket, planet and atom looking things. Slapped them all together and boom. Looked like a tree to me lol So I went with it.

They thought Jesus was dead too. Then BAM, right back to annoy you a bit longer.

Holy shit you are talented! keep up the good work!

Nice design, but I don't see this tree design you're talking about.

Anyway, keep it up with the logo designs!

25-10-2017, 05:32 AM

Louise Wrote: Nice design, but I don't see this tree design you're talking about.

Anyway, keep it up with the logo designs!

Same, I'm genuinely retarded xD

25-10-2017, 05:32 AM

Louise Wrote: Nice design, but I don't see this tree design you're talking about.

Anyway, keep it up with the logo designs!

Same, I'm genuinely retarded xD