Call of Duty

What do you guys think of WW2 compared to the older Cal of Dutys?l

Submitted by nhelweg, , Thread ID: 75722

Thread Closed
16-02-2018, 11:06 PM
#1
I am interested in what other people think of WW2 compared to older CODs.

RE: What do you guys think of WW2 compared to the older Cal of Dutys?l

#2
The game does bring back the old feel like there was in World At War but no new cod will be the same as the old cods unless it is a exact remaster like what they did with cod4.

RE: What do you guys think of WW2 compared to the older Cal of Dutys?l

This post was last modified: 16-02-2018, 11:12 PM by Kyoko
#3
I won't say it's bad nor good, I have a mixed opinion and I think that the futuristic CODs weren't that bad and actually it was a change from the old school type of CODs it switched it up. See but World War 2 was pretty much already seen way TOO much in COD and there's only so much you can do with World War II when it comes to CODs these days. I also am not a fan of the support the game has, it's taken months to get some glitches patched and even when they ban people they ban innocent people. Zombies mode is buggy and isn't even supported either and to include I messaged Activisions support on an issue via Twitter, I got ignored and I sent multiple messages at different time periods and months later I called their support shit only to get an auto-response. It's still a good game though.
[Image: tumblr_okvfwkEVqN1rztjsno1_500.png]

RE: What do you guys think of WW2 compared to the older Cal of Dutys?l

#4
I haven't played too much the old cod, but in my opinion COD WW2 campaign is pretty well done, the only thing well done in the last years tbh.
[Image: Xs3ZTCS.gif]

RE: What do you guys think of WW2 compared to the older Cal of Dutys?l

#5
16-02-2018, 11:20 PM
NikolaTesla Wrote:
I haven't played too much the old cod, but in my opinion COD WW2 campaign is pretty well done, the only thing well done in the last years tbh.

I've played both old and new CoD. For the degree of technology, the old CoD campaigns were decent. However, the new ones (for the amount of technology we have, and the amount of time put into these games) could be so much more defined, more interactive. There is little choice in the matters, little freedom in the campaigns. I was disappointed in the new campaign, which is rare for me because I'm usually defending the new CoDs to my friends, who always say the newest CoDs suck.
It rhymes with braille, not drool.

RE: What do you guys think of WW2 compared to the older Cal of Dutys?l

#6
its a basic cod, not realy fun older was better i think

RE: What do you guys think of WW2 compared to the older Cal of Dutys?l

#7
The game does bring back the old feel like there was in World At War but no new cod will be the same as the old cods unless it is a exact remaster like what they did with cod4.

RE: What do you guys think of WW2 compared to the older Cal of Dutys?l

#8
i would take every cod before mw3 over the new ones. really

RE: What do you guys think of WW2 compared to the older Cal of Dutys?l

#9
Hum, the game was very great, and the graphics was awesome

RE: What do you guys think of WW2 compared to the older Cal of Dutys?l

#10
i l ike ww2 because he have boum boum and tra ..... and big shaq play on this game

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)