Your thoughts on 5G towers?

I would have to say 5G radio waves is not well understood by the masses. Not a lot of completed studies done since it's an emerging tech. Definitely lots of advantages but still some unknowns. There has been reports of people getting cancer or leukemia living near certain areas with high transmission power stations and people are concerned about getting brain cancer with the use of cell phones.

Honestly though, even if it does cause cancer, it's not like instant cancer but takes years to develop or decades perhaps (still not good at all) but what that does mean is hopefully in the future, we may be able to cure cancer (hopefully).

Personally, I think the 5G Coronavirus allegations are hilarious. It's really unfortunate that people would ever truly believe such a stupid conspiracy, but that's my two cents. It's really funny to think that people have eaten enough tide pods to believe such a stupid idea. Trying to keep this as non-offensive as I can, but it's a real challenge..

From a power emission standpoint 5G should be more safe because there will be more small antennas that will operate with less wattage output. More uniform coverage but with less power peaks.
Frequency is different from 4G and higher (between 30ghz and 90ghz) still they are non-ionizing radiation, so no harm on a cellular level.

I am really against this technology, I still cant find the official documentation for its use and this brings some uncertainty, I dont understand at all why mobile devices need such bandwidths. :monkachunka:

26-04-2020, 07:42 AM

t33p Wrote: I am really against this technology, I still cant find the official documentation for its use and this brings some uncertainty, I dont understand at all why mobile devices need such bandwidths. :monkachunka:

The real scope of 5G is not giving more bandwith to smartphone but for IOT devices interconnection on short range. In 2025 there will be statistically 75 Billions of iot devices and most of them will need to stream I/O data

26-04-2020, 08:01 AM

Grogger Wrote: The real scope of 5G is not giving more bandwith to smartphone but for IOT devices interconnection on short range. In 2025 there will be statistically 75 Billions of iot devices and most of them will need to stream I/O data

Thanks for the explanation buddy, I really appreciate it, but I still do not approve of this technology in mass application until the developers of this technology reveal all its secrets. :blobthink:

26-04-2020, 08:17 AM

t33p Wrote: Thanks for the explanation buddy, I really appreciate it, but I still do not approve of this technology in mass application until the developers of this technology reveal all its secrets. :blobthink:

For sure health studies on 5g are far from be completeand yes there is not trasparency about some informations
But my point is:who live in cities or denses populated areas is exposed every dayto a lot of more dangerouscontaminant and radiations, 5g in that case is just one more things to consider

Then if someone is so concerned about 5g and possible health side effects why the heck is living in a city full of smog for example?
Peraphs filling our lungs of air pollutants is socially acceptednowadays...

penso che le torri 5g influenzano di molto il coronavirus!

love the idea, 5G is causing corona :D one of the must dumb things I heard this year

I think 5G is a new technology, we should adapt to its arrival