critiques?

13-05-2018, 10:26 PM

Lukecetion Wrote:

It is used in the manner of a logo, it is used with a logo to make a more complex logo. It isn't used as a piece of art, nor a design element or a print. Hence it's only use is as a logo. The reason the orange is there doesn't make it any better, stating something like that makes it sound more like an excuse than a reason as well. The pills aren't blended with the image, they are just pasted unto it like taping two pieces of white cardboard to a brown piece of cardboard.

The texture still makes no sense to the design, nor does it help the design in anyway. In-fact, as I stated it has no real effect because if you decrease the size of the image, the texture will be next to impossible to see. If you increase it's size, the poor quality of the texture will just ruin it further. In it's current size it can only be used as a form of logo and not a print or a graphical element. As a logo it is too complex for it's own good so it isn't even good for that, as explained above.

Whenever or not you like it doesn't make it better on a design when it crashes with well established guidelines for basic design. I can also at least count three stock images if you count the signature version of it. The first is the tiger (which you posted in the OG post), the second is the pills and the third is the Actavis logo. Unless you claim that you drew the tiger by hand as well as the pills. Which I severely doubt because the stock tiger you posted and your finished image are exactly the same excluding the lower quality, texture and color change.

The pills are jagged at some places, meaning they weren't made with a vector tool of any kind, but rather cut out of another image poorly, leaving jagged edges like that. They could also be hand drawn rather poorly I guess, but I doubt it.Hence the tiger is a stock (you even posted the original), the pills are stocks (very likely stocks at least) and the Actavis logo is also a stock (as you just said). The texture is likely a stock or a preset filter/element in Photoshop if I am not mistaken.

The fact that you resized the image to fit in your signature proves my point. In your signature you can barely see the texture, it isn't noticeable and several other details have also been lost. If an image was hand drawn to be displayed at such a low resolution then it would remove certain details to make room for more space to use more bold expressions.

I have a piece of advice.When you ask for critique and someone gives it to you, don'tdismiss that critique easily, especially not when it is constructive and can help you improve.

13-05-2018, 04:17 AM

Syrup Wrote: this is my actavis percocet tiger pic thing i made in like a couple hours


it'a based off of:

r8?

15-05-2018, 10:15 PM

Mion1 Wrote: it's cool but missing quality for some reason. might wanna fix that

13-05-2018, 04:17 AM

Syrup Wrote: this is my actavis percocet tiger pic thing i made in like a couple hours


it'a based off of:

r8?

16-05-2018, 01:35 AM

nodgear Wrote: That blue text about your nick change isn't cool.
love the tiger btw

16-05-2018, 07:49 PM

JxB1990 Wrote: Good desing, but you should work on your colors!

As someone said too purple!

16-05-2018, 07:53 PM

behindtheshadows Wrote: Yo no joke i would like buy this for 5$. (Well if the color scheme was diffrent). You could make some money of this tbh

16-05-2018, 08:02 PM

Syrup Wrote: nah im just making this for fun