how bad really was hitler?

Lol man Idk if this is bait but if it is, its not great

he was very bad and is responsible for millions of deaths and put people in death camps

I guess it's not a good idea to put people in a room and burn them, huh?

Yeah he was pretty terrible, brought a lot of death.

04-05-2021, 07:35 AM

arthouse Wrote: He was way worse than Stalin. It's a popular Nazi and even mainstream far right talking point that "Hitler didn't kill nearly as many people as Stalin/Mao/etc.!" There are two huge problems with this:
1. Stalin's body count is extremely exaggerated. Under his rule, many people were targeted, many died in famines which may or may not have been made intentionally worse, etc. But Cold War propaganda produced extremely biased scholarship that became accepted in the West. If you use the same methods of popular "death toll of communism" memesto find the death of capitalism, it's far, far higher--even the deaths of Nazi soldiers are counted among Stalin's deaths. In the end, Stalin wasn't really a communist, just a dictator who capitalist exaggerated the evil of to make 20th centurycommunism look bad.
2. Hitler's body count was characteristically far worse because...

By the way, anybody who tells you "Hitler's not as bad as people say," do not listen to them--they're stupid at best and probably alt right

You can say the same about people who tell you "Stalin's not as bad as people say." They were both horrible.

Yeah I mean putting people in trains and camps is not a really good thing.

Very Bad although he did want to become a painter

There is not even to ask the question normally ...

Some germans say his plan overall was a good idea, a clean and just german germany.

Which i find absolutely bullshit personally, but i guess everyone has their own opinion.

I think he was prtty, pretty bad.

i dont think mass genocide to create a master race is a good thing......