Save 20% on upgrades by using the code "EASTER21" on checkout!
Feedback and Suggestions

Infected Content Punishment

Submitted by KanameS, , Thread ID: 202238

KanameS
Backdoor Buster
Level:
9
Reputation:
39
Posts:
259
Likes:
55
Credits:
438
01-04-2021, 01:11 PM
#1
I think we should warn and give them time to remove backdoor out of there content instead of banning them
since we don't know if they really put a backdoor in it on purpose or they just releak stuffs.
[Image: 1578060104.gif]
My Website

RE: Infected Content Punishment

Oathkeeper
It means everything
Level:
67
Reputation:
121
Posts:
1.46K
Likes:
186
Credits:
1.14K
01-04-2021, 01:41 PM
This post was last modified: 01-04-2021, 01:42 PM by Oathkeeper
#2
Ya know, even releaks are bannable.
A lot of people just unlock something here and just re-upload it. Due to the volume, it's not easily noticable.

In any case, don't know much about gmod, but the proposition seems fair enough.
But I have no idea how it can be executed. Just telling them "hey, your leak has a backdoor, remove it please" seems inefficient. Perhaps we could snip the link and tell them to reupload it properly possibly?
[Image: giphy.gif]
My grand upgrader (thrice): Ninja

RE: Infected Content Punishment

KanameS
Backdoor Buster
Level:
9
Reputation:
39
Posts:
259
Likes:
55
Credits:
438
OP
01-04-2021, 02:57 PM
#3
01-04-2021, 01:41 PM
Oathkeeper Wrote:
Ya know, even releaks are bannable.
A lot of people just unlock something here and just re-upload it. Due to the volume, it's not easily noticable.

I just realized that people can just unlock stuff and re-upload that make sense for banning them
but still, we don't really know who re-upload stuff they might get their stuff from the server they developed or somewhere else

01-04-2021, 01:41 PM
Oathkeeper Wrote:
But I have no idea how it can be executed. Just telling them "hey, your leak has a backdoor, remove it please" seems inefficient. Perhaps we could snip the link and tell them to reupload it properly possibly?

That's what I want it to be Yuun already done that now
[Image: 1578060104.gif]
My Website

RE: Infected Content Punishment

Nasyr
Forum Janitor
Administrators
Level:
32
Reputation:
277
Posts:
8.5K
Likes:
885
Credits:
191
02-04-2021, 08:40 PM
#4
The reason we ban them and trash all their leaks is that we don't want people to continue to unlock it and put their servers etc at risk. When we ban a user for it they can appeal it, I'd say more than 80% of people appeal those bans. At the end of the day if you share something, even if you stole it from somewhere you're considered responsible for that leak.

RE: Infected Content Punishment

drewski47
Member
Level:
13
Reputation:
0
Posts:
144
Likes:
2
Credits:
0
02-04-2021, 08:45 PM
#5
WOW I DIDNT KNOW THAT THIS WAS THE CASE WITH RELEAKS THANKS FOR THE INFO

RE: Infected Content Punishment

AzraelX
Active Member
Level:
49
Reputation:
4
Posts:
497
Likes:
7
Credits:
961
06-04-2021, 01:27 PM
#6
01-04-2021, 01:41 PM
Oathkeeper Wrote:
Ya know, even releaks are bannable.
A lot of people just unlock something here and just re-upload it. Due to the volume, it's not easily noticable.

In any case, don't know much about gmod, but the proposition seems fair enough.
But I have no idea how it can be executed. Just telling them "hey, your leak has a backdoor, remove it please" seems inefficient. Perhaps we could snip the link and tell them to reupload it properly possibly?


can you issue a temporary ban? with a warning to the inbox

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)